Sunday, 20 April 2025

paper 206: African Literature

Hello readers!!


This blog task is about Assignment writing on A Limited Woman: Character is in Question in Buchi Emecheta Novel The Joys of Motherhood 


Table of contents:-

Personal Information

Assignment Details

Abstract 

Keywords 

Introduction

About Buchi Emecheta 

Overview of the Novel 

Nnu Ego in Ebuza: The begging 

Contradiction that Limit Nnu Ego 

Operating Forces  and issue of Motherhood

Other characters as Limited 

Conclusion 

References


Personal Information:-

Name:- Divya Bharatbhai Jadav

Batch :- M.A.sem 4 ( 2023- 2025)

Email Address:- divyajadav5563@gmail. com

Roll number:- 7


Assignment Details:-

Topic:- A Limited Woman: Character is in Question in Buchi Emecheta Novel The Joys of Motherhood

Paper:-206: The African Literature 

Subject code:- 22413

Submitted to:- Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, MKBU, Bhavnagar

Date of Submission:- 17 April 2025

About Assignment:- In this assignment I will try to define’ A Limited Woman: Character is in Question in Buchi Emecheta Novel The Joys of Motherhood









Abstract:-

Buchi Emecheta's The Joys of Motherhood tells the story of Nnu Ego, a rural Igbo woman. Nnu Ego finds herself in Lagos, the urbanized capital of Nigeria. Through the feminist lens, patriarchy is frequently considered to be a main factor at play in the oppression of women within both tribal and colonized countries. Similarly, postcolonial theory often focuses on capitalism and how a western sense of superiority wrongly affects the definition of self, particularly for people native to third world countries. Based on these findings, the majority of critics also argue about the extent to which Nnu Ego plays an integral part in her oppression and eventual downfall.

However, in regard to The Joys of Motherhood and in the case of Nnu Ego, certain factors are overlooked by such critics. Throughout the novel, Emecheta inserts evident contradictions that blur the lines between opportunity and victimization, making it difficult to judge Nnu Ego's character. These contradictions are evident in the portrayals of polygamy and economics within Lagos. There are also other criteria to consider. It is obvious that Nnu Ego at times plays a crucial role in her own oppression. Her disjointed reasoning and illogical faith in motherhood cause her to repeatedly make poor decisions. These poor decisions become evident causal factors for her demise. Yet, when her upbringing is taken into account and when other characters also show to be limited, the setting is brought into question as a key factor in her oppression.

There are also several operating forces at play within the novel that affect Nnu Ego in a way that make it difficult to critique her character. The degrading work force, World War II and the Christian concept of heaven play major roles in exacerbating her subjugation. These forces along with motherhood and the mentioned contradictions open

a window into Emecheta's intentions in writing such a limited character as Nnu Ego. Her second and somewhat autobiographical novel. Second Class Citizen is considered, and the main character Adah is juxtaposed with Nnu Ego, a new platform to evaluate the character and Emecheta's purpose emerges. It becomes evident that Buchi Emecheta is purposely writing Nnu Ego as a limited character that plays a role in her own oppression while simultaneously relinquishing her blame.


Keywords:-

Nnu Ego in Ebuza: The begging, Contradiction that Limit Nnu Ego ,Operating Forces  and issue of Motherhood,Other characters as Limited 


Introduction:-

One of Buchi Emecheta's most acclaimed novels is The Joys of Motherhood. Published in 1979, the novel is about a traditional Igbo woman who in 1934 finds herself in colonial Lagos, Nigeria. The main character, Nnu Ego, battles with accepting the new culture, Lagos, without abandoning her native culture. Her Igbo background is a patriarchal one where marriage and having children are the most important goals for a woman. A sense of community is highly valued, and people are seen for what they can add to their compound. On the other hand, the culture of Lagos stresses money and individual success. Having many children in Lagos is not valued as it can cause financial burdens. Communities cease to exist as each person is not valued as part of a whole. Men compete for jobs and families compete for housing. Nnu Ego thus becomes trapped between two separate belief systems. Throughout her journey within these cultures she ultimately fails to cope with the changing environments. Due to her upbringing and the operating forces in Lagos, she proves to be a limited character lacking the tools needed to thrive.


Within this third person narrative, Emecheta portrays Nnu Ego's struggle through journeys within both cultures. Born of an Igbo chief, Agbadi, and his mistress, Ona, Nnu Ego has an unusual childhood. She is never forced or pressured into marriage like other girls in her village. Nonetheless, wanting desperately to be a mother, Nnu Ego fails at her first marriage with Amatokwu. After not becoming pregnant right away, she makes unwise decisions to breastfeed and to contemplate stealing his second wife's baby. She is thus returned to Agbadi, who then returns the bride price to Amatokwu.


Next, Nnu Ego travels to Lagos with hopes of succeeding with her second husband Nnaife. However, upon arrival Nnu Ego is disheartened with Nniafe and with what Lagos has to offer. Her struggle begins as she has many children and makes decisions that mold her life in the new modern world.


While in Lagos, she acquires a junior wife, Adaku, and fails at creating a bond with her. She makes poor decisions in regard to community, family, economics and most importantly, motherhood. These decisions ultimately send her down a road of loneliness and defeat. At the end of the novel and after approximately twenty years in Lagos Ego dies alone in a ditch. She does not reap the benefits from motherhood that she has for over the years. Her poor decisions show to be a symptom of her displacement rather than mere personality traits.


There are many reasons Nnu Ego is denied her traditional rights as a mother while she is still alive. Critics disagree on the level of responsibility for which Nnu Ego should be held accountable and on the reasons Emecheta would write a limited character who repeatedly makes poor decisions. Critics, such as Laura Dubek, argue that Nnu Ego is. simply a victim of patriarchal oppression. Dubek highlights the negative aspects of both Nnu Ego's Igbo background and the culture of capitalist Lagos. Salome Nnomorele, on the other hand, suggests that Nnu Ego is not an object of patriarchy, but plays a role in her own oppression. Yet another critic, Cynthia Ward, sees Nnu Ego as a character full of contradictory perspectives and thus doomed to fail. Therefore, Nnu Ego is triumphant or tragic depending on how one chooses to read the novel. She also is quite possibly meant to be a character full of flaws and limitations. Emecheta has reasons for creating such a woman and uses Nnu Ego's limited nature to prove a point.


Theodora Akachi Ezeigbo highlights a negative aspect of this method of characterdevelopment. Yes, Emecheta presents a character who fails to benefit from both her traditional culture and a more liberal modern society in which she finds herself. Ezeigbo suggests that in doing this Emecheta fails to portray the benefits of Nnu Ego's traditional society.


Emecheta is a committed writer who holds very strong views concerning the evils of patriarchal institutions and conventions that hold women down in Igbo society. Her justified attack on these evils can be veryuncompromising, leading her to neglect to use her power as a creative artist also to highlight the positive aspects of tradition, the strengths,resilience and triumphs of women in traditional society as Nwapa. (160) In The Joys of Motherhood Emecheta chooses not to highlight positive aspects in both cultures. She is just as uncompromising when it comes to Lagos as she is to Nnu Ego's Igbo life.


Because Nnu Ego fails in both her Igbo village and in Lagos, Emecheta implies that there is more than social and political oppression at play. It then bec that Nnu Ego's decisions play a major role in her life's outcome. In turn, ha 10/62 cannot be overlooked as a determinant of her oppression. Obviously, this double sword is planted on purpose. It is Emecheta's choice to write such a character that needs to be examined along with how Nnu Ego arrives at a place where she is incapable of making wise decisions. It must be kept in mind that the decisions are made from the viewpoint of a limited character: a character lacking the tools to overcome her circumstances.


In contemplating the reasons behind Nnu Ego's limited character, it is helpful to consider other factors outside of the novel itself. Buchi Emecheta's second novel SecondClass Citizen, 1974, portrays a character almost the complete opposite of Nnu Ego, a character who overcomes various forces of oppression. Because the main character, Adah, is said to be based on Emecheta herself, the novel offers a window into how Emecheta views such issues as patriarchy, capitalism, and her native Igbo tradition. This along with other operating oppressive factors, illustrated in The Joys of Motherhood, will be examined to shed more light on exactly why and how Nnu Ego failed at life.


The first operating factor is Nnu Ego's second husband Nnaife and how a lack of an Igbo identity affects their marriage. The next factor is World War II and how it exacerbates Nnu Ego's and Nnaife's lack of education. Another factor is Christianity and the ways it fills Nau Ego with false hope and complacency. Additionally, her chi or African life force, believed to be that of a slave woman, is an operating force that shapes her life negatively and is a bad influence on her decisions. The final force operating is the devastation of failed motherhood and how it robs Nnu Ego of the life she desired.


About Buchi Emecheta :-


Buchi Emecheta was a Nigerian-born writer who wrote many famous novels about women’s life, struggles and identity. 


She was born in 1944 and later moved to London, where she faced many challenges as a black single mother. Her books mostly talk about African women who fight against culture, tradition, and poverty. 


Her most popular novels include :

  • The Joys of Motherhood

  • Second-Class Citizen

  • The Bride Price

Emecheta’s writing is powerful because she shows both the pain and strength of women. She also talks about how colonialism and patriarchy affect African society. She died in 2017 but her works are still respected around the world.



Characters in the Novel:


Nnu Ego: The protagonist, a traditional Igbo woman whose identity is shaped by her role as a mother. Her entire life is defined by sacrifice, but she ultimately finds no joy in the motherhood she so values.


Nnaife Owulum: Nnu Ego’s husband, who works for a British family. He is lazy, irresponsible, and self-centered, and later takes another wife. He represents both the failures of patriarchy and colonial influence.


Ona: Nnu Ego’s mother, a strong and independent woman who chooses not to marry. She influences Nnu Ego’s beliefs about pride and family honor.


Agbadi: Nnu Ego’s father, a proud and respected chief. His relationship with Ona is complex—loving but patriarchal.


Adaku: Nnaife’s second wife, who later chooses financial independence over traditional expectations. She serves as a foil to Nnu Ego.


Oshia: Nnu Ego’s first surviving son. He receives an education and eventually leaves for the U.S., showing little concern for his mother’s suffering.


Ngozi, Adim, and other children: Nnu Ego’s other children, who represent her dreams, burdens, and eventual disillusionment.




Overview of the Novel :-


The Joys of Motherhood is a powerful novel by Buchi Emecheta, set in colonial and postcolonial Nigeria. It tells the story of Nnu Ego, a traditional Igbo woman whose identity and worth are tied to her ability to bear children. Believing motherhood to be the highest form of fulfillment, Nnu Ego dedicates her life to her children. However, her experience is marked by poverty, sacrifice, and emotional isolation.



The Joys of Motherhood follows the life of Nnu Ego, a woman from a traditional Igbo background in Nigeria. The novel opens with her attempted suicide in Lagos, which triggers a reflection on her life.


Nnu Ego is the daughter of a respected chief, Nwokocha Agbadi, and Ona, a strong-willed woman. She is initially married to a man who turns out to be impotent, leading to a failed marriage. Eventually, she is married off to Nnaife Owulum, a man working as a washerman in colonial Lagos.


In Lagos, Nnu Ego believes that bearing children, especially sons, will secure her happiness, respect, and legacy. She has multiple children, yet instead of joy, her life becomes a struggle filled with poverty, emotional neglect, and endless sacrifice.


She endures Nnaife’s indifference, his involvement in polygamy, and the pressures of raising children in an urban environment that offers little support. Her sons, whom she sacrifices everything for, grow up and leave, showing little appreciation for her efforts.


The novel ends tragically: Nnu Ego dies alone, unappreciated by the very children she dedicated her life to. Despite her sacrifices, she receives no true fulfillment from motherhood—only loneliness and sorrow.



Themes  in the Novel 


1. Motherhood and Sacrifice


The title is deeply ironic. Rather than joy, Nnu Ego’s motherhood brings her suffering, poverty, and disappointment. The novel critiques the romanticized idea that motherhood is a woman’s ultimate purpose and joy.


2. Patriarchy and Gender Roles


Nnu Ego is trapped in a society that values women only for their ability to produce male heirs. Men like Nnaife enjoy more freedom and power, while women bear the brunt of economic and emotional labor.


3. Colonialism and Cultural Change


Set during the colonial and early postcolonial period in Nigeria, the novel shows how Western influence disrupts traditional Igbo values. The clash between rural traditions and urban life is a major source of conflict and identity crisis.


4. Disillusionment and Isolation


Despite all her efforts, Nnu Ego ends up alone, suggesting that loyalty and hard work do not guarantee reward or respect—especially for women. Her emotional isolation grows with time, showing the failure of the roles she’s been forced to fulfill.


5. Female Agency and Resistance


Characters like Adaku challenge traditional roles by seeking independence. While Nnu Ego conforms to tradition, Adaku represents a new model of womanhood—economically and socially empowered.


6. Family and Betrayal


The novel explores the painful irony that the very people Nnu Ego sacrifices for—her children—abandon her. This challenges the assumption that family loyalty is natural or guaranteed.


Nnu Ego in Ebuza: The begging :-


The main character, Nnu Ego, is no heroine. She is not the female character that Africans are meant to look up to and mold their lives after. Instead, she is limited in numerous ways causing her to make poor choices throughout the novel. At times, she 11/62 appears to be completely incapable of making wise decisions, particularly when she finds herself in circumstances unheard of in her native culture. Other times she may come across as flawed and stubborn. However, these attributes are merely a symptom of what she is forced to face when both cultures become juxtaposed. To understand Nnu Ego as a weak character, it is crucial to examine her life in an Igbo village before she made her journey to Lagos and how her experiences there rob her of the tools needed to thrive in harsh urban conditions.


Ironically, the years Nnu Ego spends in her tribal home are a catalyst for her troubles in Lagos. From birth, Nou Ego is given opportunities and choices that most Igbo women do not have. Born of Ona, a woman never allowed or wanting to marry, Nnu Ego could not have been more unlike her mother. Nnoromele illustrates Ona's unique womanhood when she writes,


Ona's idea of womanhood ran counter to the general notion that African women equate womanhood or selfhood with motherhood. [...] Ona wants Nau Ego to be the master of her own fate, the subject of her actions rather than the object of other people's actions and decisions. (182)


At a time when women lived to serve their husbands and dreamed of being a senior wife. Ona exhibited individuality like that of a man picking his bride. Unfortunately, she died giving birth to Nnu Ego and never passed on those beliefs. However, she did leave


wishes behind Agbadi to "see that however much you love our daughter Nnu Ego you allow her to have a life of her own, a husband if she wants one. Allow her to be a woman" (Emecheta, The Joys of Motherhood 28). Agbadi carried out the request.


In weighing the sadness of Nnu Ego's eventual reality, perhaps most disheartening is that she had a chance most women in her society did not. Being the daughter of Ona and the apple of Agbadi's eye, she was given the choice of marrying or living a life similar to her mother's. Not many fathers in Ibuza would tell their daue "Don't worry, daughter. If you find life unbearable.

In weighing the sadness of Nnu Ego's eventual reality, perhaps most disheartening is that she had a chance most women in her society did not. Being the daughter of Ona and the apple of Agbadi's eye, she was given the choice of marrying or living a life similar to her mother's. Not many fathers in Ibuza would tell their daughters, "Don't worry, daughter. If you find life unbearable, you can always come here to live" (Emecheta, The Joys of Motherhood 33). This opportunity, however, runs counter to what Nnu Ego so desperately wants. She does not want to be like her moth precisely the problem. Emecheta's portrayal of Ona helps to shape Nnu i view of her mother.




Though Ona is a revered woman in the Igbo community by men, Emecheta attempts to paint Ona's life as miserable having been robbed of the right to marry. Because of her "freedom" to remain unwed, other women in the village view her as wild and choose not to befriend her. In her book Lessons of Solidarity: Buchi Emecheta and Mariama Ba on Female Victimizers, Laura Dubek agrees with Emecheta's portrayal when she writes, "In The Joys of Motherhood Emecheta's portrait of Ona highlights the negative aspects of traditional Igbo culture for women, suggesting that the principle of 'male daughter' denies women independence and personal happiness by alienating them from other women" (207). It is this viewpoint that limits Nnu Ego. Because of her mother's role as a male daughter, Nnu Ego finds it even more important to marry. From the time she was a young girl, Nnu Ego expresses the strong desire to wed and begin


having children. She does not realize the positive aspects that could be associated with being a "male" daughter.


Little does Nnu Ego know that marriage is ultimately what oppresses her. While Dubek and Emecheta suggest that being denied marriage robs a woman of happiness, in Nnu Ego's case marriage never grants her independence, happiness, or the friendship of other women. In contrast, marriage causes Nnu Ego to become further bound to male dominance. Emecheta, through the character of Ona, thus places Nnu Ego in a precarious situation from birth. Nnu Ego is raised believing that without marriage, she will not fit in with her fellow community, as Ona did not fit in. Her mother is presented as a victim and therefore a background to Nnu Ego's oppression while simultaneously presented as an exception to the harsh expectations put upon women. Nnu Ego quickly learns that marriage is a no win situation.


There are two ways to view the concept of chi in this novel. Nau Ego is far from a slave yet she personally relates to one. Some would argue the parallel Emecheta draws between Nnu Ego and a slave illustrates that regardless of class the female subject must deal with oppression. "Chi is a central point in the psychology, thought and belief of the Igbo. People recognize it as being responsible for their wealth and prosperity, life and health, success, failure, and for all their fortunes and misfortunes. In general, the Igbo consider Chi as the sole controller of their life affairs" (Qnukawa 108). It appears in the novel that Nnu Ego does in fact consider her chi to be in control of her life. The belief that Nnu Ego's chi is cursed limits her character even more. Due to this belief, Nnu Ego becomes trapped into thinking she will never escape her plight and at times relinquishes any attempts. ""O my chi, why do you have to bring me so low? Why must I be punished? I am sorry for what my father did and I am sure he is sorry too. But try to forgive us. Many a night she cried tears of frustration and hopelessness" (Emecheta. The Joys of Motherhood 32). This portrayal places her chi as a valid reason for her troubles.


Contradiction that Limit Nnu Ego :


Nnu Ego dwells within a paradox. Just when something appears to be of benefit, such as the opportunity for personal financial gain, the consequences become all too clear. To assimilate would mean losing her sacred placement as the traditional Igbo woman Emecheta portrays. There are several contradictions in culture and beliefs that cage Nnu Ego while she is in Lagos. For example, the differences in polygamy in Ibuza versus Lagos are startling and stifle any benefit Nnu Ego could reap from the tradition. Also, money and the rules of economics take on a new meaning: one that Nnu Ego struggles to understand and master. Within these two realms of contradiction, Nnu Ego makes devastating decisions that hurt her life. While having to make journeys through two varying cultures limits Nnu Ego enough, their contradictions within these limit her even further.


Some would argue that since Nnu Ego makes poor decisions in both cultures the setting becomes less relevant than her character. It could be interpreted that she is given the liberty to pick and choose which values to honor, and she continually chooses the wrong ones. However, it is undeniable that these contradictions place Nnu Ego at a disadvantage and further limit her abilities to cope with her changing environment. This emphasis on character unfairly puts Nnu Ego further under the microscope.


Why would Emecheta choose to include such contradictions in the novel? By her interjecting these contradictory view points, the reader gets the impression that life in Ibuza and Lagos was malleable. It then becomes difficult to discern what is realistic and what is meant to be ironic. Consequently, a character convoluted with twisted perspectives is more difficult to judge. Cynthia Ward sheds more light on this notion.


One constant in both Ibuza and Lagos is the presence of polygamy; women and men favor it. Unluckily, the presence of polygamy in Lagos tends to strip Nnu Ego of its intended benefits. Within the western mentality, polygamy is seen as an oppressive institution. "While polygamy was not a perfect marital agreement," Teresa Derrickson illustrates, "it was well suited to the agrarian lifestyle of the Igbo people and contained several built-in mechanisms that allowed women to better cope with the burdens of that type of lifestyle" (44). Polygamy allowed for a system of checks and balances. Women could form a conglomerate to exercise power over the husband by ensuring equality in workloads and sufficient food supplies. Unfortunately. Nnu Ego does not experience the sense of camaraderie among women that comes with polygamy because she views the other women in Lagos as competition. This view of other women is not necessarily her fault since she was a bastard child who lacked friendships and as a young woman lacked kinship with other women in her tribe.


Emecheta presents a character that disconnects from the very things that lend support and simultaneously attaches to what is oppressing her. Someone with this nature is obviously lost. Nnu Ego is so determined to be a successful wife and mother that anything standing in her way must be destroyed. Emecheta insinuates that just because a woman is raised in Igbo tradition does not mean that she will grasp and be able to use what little tools that background may provide. Here is a character not even capable of accepting help because everyone is viewed as a threat. This limits Nnu Ego by denying her the benefit of a potential friend in her junior wife.


Though polygamy, however varying, is a constant in both cultures, economics is not. The differences in economics between Igbo village life and life in Lagos pose many confusions for Nnu Ego. Traditionally. Igbo women make their money through farming and selling their product in the open market. This method is easy for Igbo women because the land is abundant and the community is supportive. In Lagos, women are forced to become more independent entrepreneurs who lack the support of their community and are faced with selling products they know nothing about, such as cigarettes and paraffin.


In this arena, Nnu Ego makes many poor decisions. Even though she is new to the concepts of finance and making money, Nnu Ego's failure cannot be strictly attributed to her new setting. Her problem is that she shapes her idea of money on circumstantial events. One example relates to her first born son, Ngozi. After realizing the harsh life of poverty that she and Nnaife are headed for, she begins a life of petty trading in the city




market. When she becomes pregnant and even once Ngozi is born, she continues to make her way down to the market to trade. When Ngozi is a few months old, Nnu Ego finds him "stone dead" on his mat. (Emecheta, The Joys of Motherhood 55). She blames herself for his death thinking her pursuit of money is what killed him. Basing her view of money on this one incident, Nau Ego continues, throughout the novel, to see money as an enemy of motherhood.


With motherhood being her largest goal in life, money takes the backseat to everything else. "She had reminded herself of the old saying that money and children don't go together: if you spend all your time making money and getting rich, the gods wouldn't give you any children; if you wanted children, you had to forget money and be content to be poor" (Emecheta, The Joys of Motherhood 80). It is these kinds of generalizations that keep Nnu Ego in a life of poverty. She believes motherhood is her only ticket out of misery.



Operating Forces  and issue of Motherhood:-

 

 While Nnu Ego makes many bad choices, many forces operate around her that determine her fate. One force is the type of work that Nnaife, her second husband, finds he must do: washing the clothes of a white family. Another force is the Second World War and how it distances her from Nnaife and causes her oldest son, Oshia, to resent her. The last force is Christianity and the ways in which it causes Nnu Ego to become complacent through false hope. In addition to these, Nnu Ego’s unwavering commitment to motherhood poses many problems. As her social environment stifles her, she becomes further fixated on her desire to become a mother and this shows to haunt her throughout her life. 


 The transfer from a tribal model to a capitalist system is another cause of the character’s collapse. Unfortunately for Nnu Ego, this means a double injustice. Not only does she deal with the patriarchal oppressive nature of her Igbo tradition but once in Lagos she must also cope with the problems that stem from the capitalist environment. 


The first trouble she encounters is in regard to her husband’s form of work. The lack of physical labor has left him out of shape and disconnected from the quintessential Igbo man. Nnu Ego was just falling asleep when in walked a man with a belly like a pregnant cow. His hair, unlike that of men at home in Ibuza, was not closely shaved; he left a lot of it on his head, like that of a woman. His skin was pale, the skin of someone who had for along time worked in the shade and not in the open air. If her husband-to-be was like this, she thought, she would go back to her father. (Emecheta, The Joys of Motherhood)



This immediately makes Nnu Ego reluctant to love Nnaife or trust him. She is repulsed by the knowledge of his job and does not consider him to be a real man. In reality, Nnaife does what is expected of him in order to support his new bride, and in Lagos jobs like his are coveted. 


This rift between the couple greatly breaks down any solidarity the two could have had. Nnu Ego carries with her the belief that Nnaife is not good enough and she never grows to truly respect him. The two never operate as a team. While Nnaife’s perspective changes, Nnu Ego’s does not. The two become isolated as their fate is out of their control. In the capitalist society a person works to provide a service or to sell someone’s product. Rather than gaining concrete benefits as in farming, Nnaife has nothing to show for his work and at any time could lose his job. It is only natural that Nnu Ego should be turned off by him. However, she fails to realize the dangers this poses for her family. 




A second detrimental force is the Second World War. It enters into Nnu Ego’s life in a way that is unforgiving and difficult for her to understand. After losing his job working for the white man, Nnaife begins to get closer to his Igbo roots doing physical work on the railroad; his body becoming toned, there appears to be a glimmer of hope that love will occur between the two. This temporary good time is cut short when Nnaife is kidnapped and forced to participate as a soldier in the Second World War supporting the British. This circumstance affects Nnu Ego for years to come.


‘Why did you not win a scholarship like other boys?’ Nnu Ego demanded. 

‘Only a few people win scholarships, and they have to be very clever.’ 

‘Then why aren’t you clever?’ retorted Nnaife. ‘Maybe if I had a peaceful 

 childhood, and not had to spend my young days selling paraffin and 

 carrying firewood--’. [. . .] Nnaife laughed and said, ‘You answer your 

 father back, eh, son? Well, maybe if your mother was not so keen on 

 getting money, maybe you would have won a scholarship. I had to go and 

 fight. I did not choose to go.’ (Emecheta, The Joys of Motherhood 185) 


In actuality, Nnu Ego spends almost all her money on Oshia’s education. Sometimes she even does so privately and lets others believe that it was Nnaife’s money to save his pride. It is because of the war that the Owulum family struggles and Oshia is made to work. Nnaife’s absence and his discrediting Nnu Ego leads to Oshia’s decision to not support his mother in her old age.



First, it is important to assess the meaning of motherhood to an Igbo woman. Nnu Ego believes that a woman’s glory is in direct correlation to how she contributes to her husband’s name. She believes that a woman who is fertile is seen as a commodity because she is a means for her husband to express his virility and role in the community. For her, all a woman stands to gain from motherhood is the comfort of knowing she will be cared for by her children and community in her old age. Nnu Ego also succumbs to a belief that only sons are assets to the Igbo society. The author Ogbaa, however, describes a different perspective when he writes: 


 Because Nnu Ego so readily accepts a belief different from Ogbaa’s description, she loses 

all self-identity outside of what she accepts to be her role as a woman. As will be seen, Nnu Ego never assumes the role of midwife or pediatrician. She never dares to dream of those standards for herself. Instead, she becomes complacent within a stifling self image. In this way, motherhood becomes her prison. Emecheta’s portrayal of motherhood is one that doesn’t provide prestige or comfort but rather one that continues to rob Nnu Ego of tools to cope with her new colonial surroundings.




Othore characters as a Limited:-


 Nnu Ego is not alone in her limited ability to cope with the ever changing environment. While she may be the character with the fewest tools, others share similar plights and also suffer. Besides Nnu Ego, two other main characters emerge in the novel: 


Nnaife and Adaku, the second wife. While Nnaife is at times portrayed as a bully and male chauvinist, he too is faced with challenges he is not able to deal with. Adaku, on the other hand, is perhaps the one character that makes it out of the vicious cycle. However, she does not bask in her redemption as her freedom comes at the price of prostitution. It is her daughters that will reap the benefits.  It is important to highlight that the main male character, the man supposedly in charge of Nnu Ego and her life, is himself limited and plagued. Here is an Igbo man who 

left his tribal home in hopes of making a better life in the city. When he takes a job as a washer and housekeeper for the Meers, a wealthy white family, he becomes undermined 

and ridiculed by traditional standards. Immanuel Wallerstein comments on the general disintegration Nnaife and others experience due to displacement.


Thus, the sentiment of communal solidarity of the village, under the pressure of the colonial situation, led to the exporting of its men [and women] into a new and often alien world, a process which in its turn would usually lead to a breakdown of this very sentiment of communal solidarity, and they began to want the things money could buy: material comforts, contacts with a wider world, modern education, and improved transport and communication. Each of these was to play a major role in changing the perspectives of the African. (34)



While it is obvious that in order to survive, within the setting of this book, one must abandon all tradition and assimilate to the colonial system, Nnaife seems to acquire all the negative aspects of what he believes is his new freedom. He begins to want those material things that don’t serve to help him or his family. An Igbo man in the village life i would never dream of spending money on such things as toys and alcohol. However, for Nnaife there are many instances where he spends a whole paycheck on palm wine. His drinking progressively gets worse and is indicative of his effort to escape. Additionally, his addiction to alcohol becomes symbolic of how capitalism corrupts the traditional Igbo man. 


 World War II also places Nnaife at an extreme disadvantage to be any kind of support for Nnu Ego and his children. Even though his job as a soldier over time provides some money for his family, it is never adequate and does not replace his absence. As in any society, a father being away will have adverse effects on a family. Even thoughNnaife is forced to fight in the war, he is close to joining on his own accord. Again, 



money is the driving force for him because he is too naïve to perceive the dangers of war. Nnaife’s acceptance of the war highlights his naiveté and the hypocrisy the war thrust upon African soldiers. It goes against Igbo morals to serve the British Army, yet Nnaife willingly supports the capitalist system that oppresses Igbo men like himself. 

 

Throughout much of the second half of the novel, Nnaife is limited as he becomes a character operating from a distance. Sadly, his presence doesn’t offer much help for Nnu Ego either. His being in the war is a double-edged sword. While in some aspects, the household is more at peace without his drinking fits, there lacks the sounding board for the family when he is gone. Nnu Ego and Adaku have no one to intervene in their fights, there is no regular pay coming in, and the children are without a father figure.


Nnaife, like Nnu Ego, is displaced. What sets the two apart is that Nnaife does not seem to be aware of his dire situation. He is the epitome of what capitalist and colonial societies depend on men being in order for their systems to run smoothly. He adheres to the rules by never wanting more than what he is given, he puts his money right back into their economy, and he fights in their war. The worst part, and what makes him flawed as a character, is that he does this without the smallest complaint. 


 When Adaku enters the novel as Nnaife’s second wife, a new platform on which to examine Nnu Ego emerges. The two women’s personalities exist on opposite poles. Though they are submerged in the same environment, the ways in which they handle it differ greatly. Adaku appears to be the image of strength and change, but while she accomplishes many feats, she too is very restricted in her outcome.


Another visible discrepancy in Adaku and Nnu Ego’s characters is the way in which they handle Nnaife’s absences while he is away at war. Nnaife being absent allows both women an opportunity to express their individuality without the presence of a man. 


During this period, Adaku uses the small amount of money she makes through trading and any dividends from Nnaife to invest in a booth for herself at the market. Adaku sees that by investing in a booth, she will eventually gain more financial independence.  In contrast, Nnu Ego still remains bound to the struggle of obeying her rural tradition within the urban setting. Rather than investing in herself and ultimately her children, she continues to engage in petty trading of firewood. She feels to get a booth would mean neglecting her children. Nnu Ego cannot see herself as a separate entity from them. Even more so, she chooses this view of herself because it further divides her from Adaku. While Adaku is the entrepreneur, Nnu Ego is the nurturing mother. 

 

Also during Nnaife’s absence, Nnu Ego decides to go home to her Igbo village. She leaves Adaku in Lagos along with Adaku’s daughters. Back home, Nnu Ego enjoys the attention she gets from other women. She is revered as a mother of several sons. Because of this, she overstays her welcome. She is reprimanded by the elder women for allowing her junior wife to head the household and get ahead in Lagos without her.




Conclusion:-



In The Joys of Motherhood, Buchi Emecheta crafts a powerful and complex portrayal of Nnu Ego, whose life becomes a symbol of the struggles faced by women trapped in traditional expectations and colonial realities. Nnu Ego’s character reflects both strength and limitation; she is a product of her environment, shaped by the patriarchal values of her Igbo culture and the pressures of urban colonial life. While she makes choices that lead to her suffering, those choices are deeply influenced by societal norms that measure a woman’s worth through motherhood alone.

Emecheta does not present Nnu Ego as a flawless victim, but as a woman whose internalized beliefs and misplaced hopes contribute to her downfall. The contradictions in her character and the forces acting against her poverty, polygamy, colonization, gender expectations, and economic hardship—limit her capacity to achieve personal fulfillment. Through this nuanced depiction, Emecheta questions the glorification of motherhood and challenges readers to reconsider the roles assigned to women in both traditional and modern societies.

Ultimately, Nnu Ego's tragedy lies not just in her individual story, but in the larger system that defines and confines her identity. Emecheta, through this powerful narrative, urges us to interrogate those systems and give voice to the women who live within them—often unseen and uncelebrated.





References :-


Blay, Richmond. “Unpacking the Image of the Female Character: The Joys of Motherhood in Perspective.” Randwick International of Social Science Journal, Randwick International Research and Analysis Institute, 23 Nov. 2024, www.academia.edu/89099728/Unpacking_the_Image_of_the_Female_Character_The_Joys_of_Motherhood_in_Perspective. Accessed 16 Apr. 2025.


The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. "Buchi Emecheta". Encyclopedia Britannica, 21 Jan. 2025,https://www.britannica.com/biography/Buchi-Emecheta. Accessed 21 April 2025.


Yu, Hope. (2010). Women Coming to Voice in Emecheta's The Joys of Motherhood and Espina-Moore's Mila's Mother. Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society. 38. 274-289. 10.2307/41762433.




(Images:1)

(Words:6,740)

Paper 207: Contemporary Literatures in English

Hello readers!!



This blog task is about Assignment writing on Voices from the Margins: A Study of Otherness in Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness


Table of contents:-

Personal Information

Assignment Details

Abstract 

Keywords 

Introduction

About Arundhati Roy 

Overview of Novel

Otherness in Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness

Conclusion 

References



Personal Information:-

Name:- Divya Bharatbhai Jadav

Batch :- M.A.sem 4 ( 2023- 2025)

Email Address:- divyajadav5563@gmail. com

Roll number:- 7


Assignment Details:-

Topic:- Voices from the Margins: A Study of Otherness in Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness

Paper:-207: Contemporary Literatures in English

Subject code:- 22414

Submitted to:- Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, MKBU, Bhavnagar

Date of Submission:- 17 April 2025

About Assignment:- In this assignment I will try to define’ Voices from the Margins: A Study of Otherness in Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness


Abstract:


Arundhati Roy's work, "The Ministry of Utmost Happiness." The objective is to uncover how Roy employs her artistic prowess to bridge the gap between marginalized segments and the mainstream, thereby attempting to rejuvenate the former glory of the Indian societal framework. Through the lens of oriental discourse, this study scrutinizes the novel, particularly emphasizing the   achievements within the established system through acts of rebellious creativity, unconventional thinking, and alternative lifestyles. This study elucidates the intricate interconnections among the novel's multi-layered narratives, which lay bare the harsh realities of society, such as the dire circumstances faced by minority groups, the degrading existence of transgender individuals, the lackluster state of governance, the struggles of Naxalites, instances of rape, murder, social inequality, and preconceived bases. In "The Ministry of Utmost Happiness," Arundhati Roy explores societal categorization through the lens of "Otherness", Characters like Anjum embody the challenges faced by those deviating from societal norms, particularly in terms of transgender identity. The narrative extends this exploration to figures like Musaa and Talio, engaged in the Kashmir conflict, highlighting a political form of "Otherness". The central aim of this research is to identify and delve into India's marginalized "Others," encompassing the impoverished, those deemed as "apostates," outsiders, and third-gender individuals, who are often subjected to subjugation victimization. This study focuses on the theory surrounding the analysis of orientalist discourse and focuses on the "Otherness" of the novel's main character Aunjum or Aftab who rejoice in their wretched condition and the survival creativity of these "Other" in their conditions of acute Precarity.



Keywords:-


 The Other, Transgender, Poor. Inequality, Prejudice, Marginalization, Societal Precarity



Introduction:-


The concept of "Otherness" by Said (1978) emerges as a result of a complex process where the dominant or centered group (referred to as "Us" or "Self") constructs the marginalized or out-group (designated as "Them" or "Other") through the act of stigmatization and differentiation. This formation of otherness, often termed "othering," revolves around the adoption of a mindset that dichotomizes individuals into the categories of "us" and "them." The out-group is understood solely as its opposition to the in-group, characterized by a perceived lack of identity, often rooted in the propagation of stigmatized and seemingly simplistic stereotypes In this dichotomy, the in-group not only defines the "Others" but also establishes a distinct and superior identity for themselves. It is crucial to recognize that otherness and identity are intertwined facets of a single coin, with  entity existing solely in relation to the other


Said (1978), in his renowned work "Orientalism," reveals that the Western perspective on the Orient depicts it as "mysterious," inert, passive, pitiable, underdeveloped, and deprived. He posits that the Western viewpoint about the East is largely shaped by literature, particularly the emerging literary form of the "novel." Said (1978) contends that this biased perception lacks a rational foundation. In "Orientalism" Said (1978) points out that marginalized individuals are essential, spoken about, and on behalf of, yet their voices are perpetually suppressed and excluded. It was the Orientalists who constructed the East as the "other." This very concept is mirrored in Arundhati Roy's "The Ministry of Utmost Happiness," wherein those in positions of power craft new definitions, identities, and labels for the less privileged, designating them as "the Other." The culmination of this process of othering is the creation of a "binary opposition," echoing Said's observations in "Orientalism." This binary opposition fragments the societal population into distinct segments, establishing the dichotomy of "the Self" versus "the other.


Arundhati Roy, acclaimed as the pioneer of Indian literature to secure the Booker Award with her debut novel "The God of Small Things" (1997), dedicated a decade of her life to crafting her second literary work. "The Ministry of Utmost Happiness (2017). This novel embarks on an internal journey spanning numerous years across the Indian subcontinent, traversing overcrowded and narrow cities, the labyrinthine lanes of Old Delhi, the expanse of the Kashmir valley, and beyond. "The Ministry of Utmost Happiness" is a narrative that seamlessly melds reality with magic, offering a narrative that is unflinchingly raw, bitter, and profoundly agonizing. Roy paints a world that is harsh and brutal, yet within every corner of this brutality. hope and kindness persist. She  skillfully plays with duality to convey a message: it juxtaposes innocence with wickedness, kindness, with harshness, the world of the exiled "Others" with that of the third sex, and the "Duniya." or the "normal" world. Roy weaves a vibrant tapestry, interweaving the story of Anjum a transgender individual once known as Aftab, and the tale of love between the modern Tilottama and the Kashmiri militant Musa. Within this narrative tapestry lie numerous holes, each one prompting reflection and further exploration as the reader delves deeper into the story.


Arundhati Roy's novel (2017), "The Ministry of Utmost Happiness," consists of twelve chapters, which can be effectively partitioned into two major segments. Roy dedicates this literary work to the Uncounseled, a reference to those residing on the societal fringes, enduring various forms of 'otherization" be it local, social, political, national, or cultural. Through this novel. Roy aims to amplify the voices of voiceless individuals within Indian society, with a significant portion of the narrative stemming from the perspectives of the marginalized sectors of society. The novel unfolds through two central narratives. The first narrative delves into the life of Anjum, a transgender individual who was born as Aftab, and the marginalized sections of Indian society. The second narrative follows Tilottama and Musa, exploring Kashmiri politics, their love story, and the deteriorated state of the natural environment. The very beginning of the novel 's story is extremely destructive and we can estimate the level and extremity of destruction by the condition of poor "friendly vultures" who usually fed on dead are now dead of diclofenac poisoning. This situation gets the attention of the reader to observe and explore how the city of Delhi runs and threatens all of its residents, animals and humans alike. The plot moves towards a mysterious woman living in a graveyard who is able to converse with the ghosts of already extinct vultures, according to her, "weren't altogether unhappy at having excused themselves." (Roy, 2017).



About Arundhati Roy:-


Arundhati Roy, born on November 24, 1961, in Shillong, India, is one of the most celebrated contemporary Indian authors, as well as a prominent political activist and public intellectual. Her full name is Suzanna Arundhati Roy, and she is known for her profound and fearless engagement with the pressing social, political, and environmental issues of modern India. Roy's background is as diverse as her writing—her father was a tea planter of Bengali origin, and her mother, Mary Roy, was a well-known women's rights activist in Kerala. Arundhati’s upbringing in South India and her exposure to different cultures and languages influenced the pluralistic and empathetic worldview reflected in her writing.

Roy first gained international fame with her debut novel The God of Small Things in 1997. The novel, which tells the story of fraternal twins in Kerala, is an evocative exploration of childhood, caste discrimination, forbidden love, and familial trauma. It won the Booker Prize for Fiction the same year, making Roy the first Indian woman to receive the award. The novel was widely praised for its poetic prose, complex narrative structure, and sensitive portrayal of the personal and political in postcolonial India.

After the success of her first novel, Roy shifted her focus toward activism and non-fiction writing, addressing critical issues such as globalization, nuclear militarization, caste violence, environmental degradation, and the displacement of tribal communities. Her essays—including The Algebra of Infinite Justice (2001), Listening to Grasshoppers (2009), and Capitalism: A Ghost Story (2014)—are known for their powerful rhetoric and fearless critique of both the Indian state and global capitalism. She has been a vocal critic of U.S. imperialism, Hindu nationalism, and neoliberal economic policies in India.

In 2017, Roy returned to fiction with her long-awaited second novel, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness, a deeply political and ambitious work that weaves together multiple narratives across the Indian subcontinent. The novel reflects on the lives of India’s marginalized communities, including transgender people (hijras), Dalits, Kashmiri Muslims, and political dissenters. Through characters like Anjum, a transgender woman, and Tilo, a woman caught in the conflict-ridden world of Kashmir, Roy explores themes of identity, displacement, resistance, and the meaning of home. The novel defies conventional narrative structure, blending magic realism with historical and political commentary.

Roy’s writing is deeply rooted in ethical responsibility and empathy for the oppressed. Her works, both fictional and non-fictional, seek to amplify the voices of those silenced by power structures. As a public intellectual, she continues to engage in political discourse through lectures, protests, and journalistic writings.

Despite facing criticism and legal challenges for her outspoken views, Roy remains undeterred. Her voice represents a rare combination of literary brilliance and moral courage, making her a unique and influential figure not only in Indian literature but also on the global stage.


About Novel:-

The novel follows a non-linear, multi-layered narrative that interweaves the lives of several marginalized individuals in modern India. It is divided into two parts: the first focusing on Anjum, a transgender woman, and the second centering around S. Tilottama (Tilo) and the Kashmir conflict.

Anjum, born as Aftab in Old Delhi, realizes early in life that she identifies as a woman. She joins the Hijra (transgender) community in Delhi but experiences trauma during the 2002 Gujarat riots. She retreats to a graveyard, where she builds a shelter for other outcasts.

In the second part, the narrative shifts to Tilo, an enigmatic woman connected to three men—Musa, a Kashmiri rebel; Naga, a journalist; and Biplab Das, an intelligence officer. Through Tilo’s journey, the novel dives into the political violence of Kashmir, religious extremism, and state surveillance.

Eventually, the lives of Anjum, Tilo, and others intersect, particularly at the graveyard sanctuary, which becomes a symbolic place of healing and resistance against systemic oppression.


Characters:

1. Anjum (formerly Aftab)

A transgender Hijra woman who seeks identity, belonging, and peace.Represents gender otherness and resilience.Symbolizes the search for dignity in a society that marginalizes her.

2. S. Tilottama (Tilo)

A mysterious, fiercely independent woman.Caught between personal love and political realities.Reflects the psychological and emotional toll of living amid conflict.

3. Musa Yeswi

A Kashmiri freedom fighter and Tilo’s lover.Represents the trauma of loss and the moral complexities of resistance.

4. Nagaraj Hariharan (Naga)

A journalist and Tilo’s former partner.Caught between truth and compromise.

5. Biplab Dasgupta (Garson Hobart)

An intelligence officer who narrates part of the story.Secretly in love with Tilo, he represents the conflicted voice of the state.

6. Zainab

A baby girl abandoned and adopted by Anjum.Symbol of hope, love, and new beginnings.


 Themes:-

1. Otherness and Marginalization

The novel gives voice to the Hijra community, Muslims, Dalits, Kashmiris, and political dissenters.It portrays how systemic discrimination is embedded in the social and political fabric of India.

2. Gender Identity

Through Anjum, the novel explores the struggles of transgender individuals to find acceptance, dignity, and love.

3. Religious and Communal Violence

Events like the Gujarat riots and the Babri Masjid demolition are referenced to show how religion is manipulated for political gain.

4. Kashmir Conflict and State Repression

The Kashmir narrative highlights state violence, militarization, media distortion, and the blurred lines between freedom fighters and terrorists.

5. Love and Loss

The relationships among Tilo, Musa, Naga, and Biplab reflect the enduring power of love in a world marked by separation and trauma.

6. Space of Sanctuary

The graveyard Anjum inhabits transforms into a home for the marginalized, symbolizing resistance, inclusion, and communal care.


7. Environmental and Urban Decay

The novel critiques ecological degradation and urban expansion that displace both people and animals.


Otherness in Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness:-


Anjum's Arrival in the Graveyard:

Anjum, a transgender woman, a central character introduced within the novel, has taken up residence in a graveyard situated behind a government hospital. In the early months of her stay, she grapples with the challenges of coexisting alongside junkies and homeless individuals. She faces a significant amount of scorn from the other denizens of the graveyard, who mockingly label her as a "clown without a circus, queen without a palace" (Roy, 2017, p. 3), but when she made an elderly blind Imam named Ziauddin her friend, others in the graveyard left her alone. The names used by graveyard residents to make fun of Anjum underscore her position in society. With the plot moving readers grasp the magnitude of alienation that Anjum is facing at the hands of society. During the conversation between Anjum and Imam, the reader notices that Anjum clearly belongs to transgender community that is specifically excluded from traditional norms and customs. Hindus are traditionally not cremated, so the Imam's assertion that "even the Hindus among you." (Roy, 2017. p. 61. People like Anjum are not cremated and inform readers that she fits into a group of people who are not supposed to deserve even the traditional transit ritual from this world.


Jahanara's Struggle with Aftab's Tran Sexuality:

After the mysterious and othered presentation of Anjum 's identity, the plot finally moves to reveal more about her. Anjum holds the fourth position among five siblings, the initial three being females. During Anjum's birth, the midwife presents her to her mother as a male child, sparking immense joy in Jahanara Begum, who had nurtured the desire for a son and had already settled on the name "Aftab" Nevertheless, a the sun graces the day following Aftab's birth, Jahanara picks up her infant son, only to be confronted with an inescapable and harsh revelation regarding his transsexuality. "The next morning, when the sun was up and the room nice and warm, she unswaddled little Aftab. She explored his tiny body-eyes nose head neck armpits. fingers to with sated, unhurried delight. That was when she discovered, nestling underneath his hoy-parts, a small, unformed, but undoubtedly girl-part. Is it possible for a mother to be terrified of her own baby? Jahanara Begum was. Her Mother's first reaction was to feel her heart constrict and her bones turn to ash. Her second reaction was to take another look to make sure she was not mistaken. Her third reaction was to recoil from what she had created while her howels convulsed and a thin stream of shit ran down her legs. Her fourth reaction was to contemplate killing herself and her child. Her fifth reaction was to pick her baby up and hold him close while she fell through a crack between the world she knew and worlds she didn't know existed." (Roy, 2017, p. 7. 8)


Aftab's Early Years and Influences:

Jahanara reached a pivotal juncture in her life when concealing Aftab's gender reality became untenable, compelling her to confide in her husband, her long-endured companion in suffering. Upon learning the shattering truth, Mulaqat (father of Aftab) concluded that he and his wife needed to consult Dr. Ghulam Nabi, a "sexologist," regarding Aftab's situation. Dr. Nabi's determination was that Aftab did not technically fall under the category of Hijra, a term of paramount importance throughout the novel. Dr. Nabi's elucidation of Hijra is as follows: "a female trapped in a male body" (Roy, 2017, p.16). Yet, as the narrative progresses. This conventional understanding of gender continually faces challenges.


Anjum's Life in the Khwabgah:

Aftab often spends extended periods outside a building referred to as the "," which translates to "dream house." This  carries multiple layers of significance within the narrative. Firstly, it symbolizes a realm of Aftab's aspirations, a space previously unknown to her, where she can express her identity freely, something she had never envisioned to be possible in her acknowledged reality. Secondly, the term "khwabgah" is laden with distinct connotations and serves as a representation of divergence from other spaces in the story. Khwabgah stands apart from mainstream society, existing almost as a parallel universe-a dreamlike world for individuals deemed unconventional and alien in the eyes of the so-called normative society.


Anjum's Relationship with Zainah and 9/11 Impact:

Moving forward. Anjum exposes certain aspects of her alienated existence in the novel. Her inclination to reveal her life's truths to Zainab, even though the child is too young to fully grasp them, signifies her longing to be acknowledged, recognized, and comprehended for her authentic self. Paradoxically, despite being surrounded by individuals who share her identity, she remains misunderstood by her peers who share her experiences. This desire to communicate her feelings might stem from her lack of close familial bonds and understanding, prompting her to establish a close relationship with her newfound child. Her belief that Zainab can navigate the harsh realities of violence mirrors her own childhood experiences, which extended beyond the typical challenges faced by a child of her gender. "After 9/11 -Every day Anjum, new in the news, watched TV reports about bomb blasts and terrorist attacks that suddenly proliferated like malaria. The Urdu papers carried stories of young Mustim boys being killed in what the police called "encounters", or being caught red-handed in the act of planning terrorist strikes and arrested. A new law was passed that allowed suspects to be detained without trial for months. In no time at all the prisons were full of young Muslim men. Anjum thanked the Almighty that Zainably was a girl. It was so much safer". (Roy, 2017)


Exploitation of the Character "Anjum" in the Ministry of Utmost Happiness:

As the political right gains influence in her country. Anjum, the resilient Hijra (transgender), becomes a poignant symbol of vulnerability and rebellion. In an intimate moment outdoors with Saddam and Biroo, their loyal companion, Anjum shares the cherished "Flyover Story," leading to an unexpected revelation that she was born to be a mother" (Ray, 2017). This revelation becomes a vulnerable confession, shaping Anjum's defiance against societal norms and expectations. Yet, the feasibility of such a role is immediately questioned by Saddam, who pragmatically introduces the element of "Reality" Frustrated by his realism, Anjum challenges him, asserting that once individuals fall from societal grace, they continue to descend while supporting others in their shared descent. The profound declaration, "We don't really exist, "(Roy, 2017) becomes the core of Anjum's philosophy, unraveling the exploitation she endures and the rebellion that defines her involvement with Funeral Services and the creation of the Jannat Guest House.


Character "Anjum" Discriminative Experiences in The Ministry of Utmost Happiness:

The struggle between the poor and the government causes the city to break out of tension in the novel, in what is supposed to be its "renewal" summer. "Scores of young reporters roam the streets of the city, they were asking urgent, empty questions; they asked the poor what it was like to be poor, the hungry what it was like to be hungry, the homeless what it was like to be homeless. Bhai Sahib, yeh baatein, aap ko kaisa lag raha hai...? Tell me, brother, how it feels to be..." (Roy. 2017, p. 99). In this passage. Roy's ridicule of young journalists is the beginning of a serious criticism of the role of the media in exploitation and discrimination. It is evident at this moment that the reporters have no sincere interest in helping the poor.


Anjum's Tapestry of Otherness: A Comparative Exploration with Tilo, Saddam Hussiam and Rubina:

In this nuanced analysis, we delve into Anjum's narrative, weaving a rich tapestry that draws. comparisons with the experiences of Tilo. Each character, in their unique way, grapples with the complexities of otherness and societal marginalization. Anjum, a resilient Hijra, builds a sanctuary at Jannat Guest House, carving out her space on the fringes of society. Drawing parallels with Tilo, the illegitimate daughter of a Christian mother and Dalit father, we unravel the common threads of' dissent against societal norms. The title encapsulates the essence of this analysis, inviting readers to explore the intersections and distinctions in the lives of Anjum and Tilo as they navigate the labyrinth of societal expectations and carve out their identities amidst adversity

Tilo was the Untouchable child of an untouchable father and a Syrian Christian mother. Her mother, to cover her sin, gave her new baby girl to an orphanage and then went back and adopted her. Tilo emerges as a passionate freedom fighter of Kashmir. Being deprived of the important requirements of life like home, proper upbringing, and parents, she turns to be rebellious against the established norms of society. Casteism and racial discrimination are also very much prevalent in Tilo's story who is "the Other", an unusual, rambling woman and the protagonist of the second section of the novel. Tilo's effort to resist the established authority can be traced to her own terrible history. Tilo has strong ideological and physical relations with Kashmiri freedom fighter Musa Yeswi. She also adopted a baby girl, who was born in Central Indian jungles to another resistance fighter Revathy. Her name was Miss Jaheen the Second, illegitimate daughter of Revathy. Tilo being the daughter of a Christian mother and a Dalit father is another "Other" in Indian society, who dissents against the social elimination of Christian and Dalit-born Indians and shows struggle and resistance through her antinormative character.


Conclusion:-

The analysis of "The Ministry of Utmost Happiness" through the lens of Orientalism reveals profound insights into the stigmatization, exploitation, and discrimination faced by the main character, Anjum, as the "Other" existing at the periphery of society. Anjum's journey serves as a microcosm of the broader Orientalist discourse, unraveling the power dynamics and societal norms that perpetuate the marginalization of transgender individuals.


The exploration of Anjum's experiences of being stigmatized, exploited, and discriminated against by those at the center of society. Through Anjum's vulnerability and resilience, the novel vividly illustrates the oppressive forces that seek to confine individuals like her within predefined societal roles. Anjum's revelation about being "born to be a mother" becomes a poignant moment of defiance, challenging the normative expectations and sparking a nuanced exploration of her identity. The shared feeling of detachment between Anjum and others, symbolized by being "astronauts" in their own right, underscores the profound disconnection from societal norms and the exploitation embedded within those expectations.


How Anjum, as an "Other," goes against customs, tests new ways of life, carves new spaces, and experiments with new roles in the society depicted in the novel. Anjum's deliberate divergence from societal norms becomes an act of rebellion, reclaiming agency in defining her identity beyond the limitations imposed by a conformist society. The creation of the Jannat Guest House and Funeral Services stands as a powerful testament to Anjum's resistance, demonstrating her commitment to building alternative spaces for marginalized individuals. Anjum's success in assembling a powerful community around these spaces highlights the transformative potential of dissent and the ability to survive and thrive on the fringes of society.


References:-

Babar Urooj, Ahmed shehryar. (n.d.). (PDF) otherness in Arundhati Roy’s “The ministry of utmosthappiness.”https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377025170

Barad, Dilip (1970, January 1). The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. https://blog.dilipbarad.com/2021/12/the-ministry-of-utmost-happiness.html

Mishra, Binod. (2020). Arundhati Roy's The Ministry of Utmost Happiness: Exploring Human Relationships through Changing Socio-CulturalLens.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338502746


(Imeges:2)

(Words: 4, 007)







208: Comparative Literature and Translation studies

Hello readers!!

This blog task is about Assignment writing on Understanding Comparative Literature: An Introduction


Table of contents:-

Personal Information

Assignment Details

Abstract 

Keywords 

Introduction

Beginning of Comparative Literature

History and Evolution of Comparative Literature

Various Schools of Comparative Literature

National Identity and Comparative Literature

Colonialism and Comparative Literature Important dimensions of comparative literature

Views of Rene Wellek

Comparative Literature and Translation Studies

Conclusion 

References



Personal Information:-

Name:- Divya Bharatbhai Jadav

Batch :- M.A.sem 4 ( 2023- 2025)

Email Address:- divyajadav5563@gmail. com

Roll number:- 7


Assignment Details:-

Topic:-Understanding Comparative Literature: An Introduction

Paper:-207: 22415 Paper 208: Comparative Literature & Translationslationslation Studies

Subject code:- 22415

Submitted to:- Sujata Binoy Gardi, Department of English, MKBU, Bhavnagar

Date of Submission:- 17 April 2025

About Assignment:- In this assignment I will try to define’ Understanding Comparative Literature: An Introduction






Abstract:-

There are many ancient and modern methods of studying literature and culture. With these methods, literature has been explained in its own way through the science of literature, Linguistics, Aesthetics. The method of study of comparative literature has been in vogue since the nineteenth century. Along with this, literature has been understood through the methods of sociology, psychology, structuralism etc. A new form of literature emerges from these methods, so comparative literature has also given a new understanding of the form of literature. Therefore, we are trying to understand this discipline in detail



Keywords:-

Comparative Literature,History and Evolution of Comparative Literature,Various Schools of Comparative Literature,National Identity and Comparative Literature



Introduction:-




      



Comparative literature is the study of literature across cultures, languages, periods, nations, ideologies, and disciplinest emerged as a discipline in Europe during the 19th century when literary scholars like Johann Gottfried Herder and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe began studying literature in various languages, cultures, and times to understand the commonalities, differences, and influences across borders. This study aids in comprehending the "other," but in reality, it assists in broadening our understanding of ourselves and distancing us from narcissistic narrowness. The Department of Comparative Literature at the University of Buffalo describes it as "the study of two or more literatures in comparison (e.g.. English and German) and their multi-dimensional components, which may encompass historical, gender, economic, cultural, social, philosophical, religious, and linguistic factors of the distinct cultures being analyzed."


One of the primary reasons for the emergence of comparative literature during the 19th and 20th centuries is the advancement in industrialization, information and communicationtechnology (ICT), globalization, migration, the rise of anti-colonial voices, shifts in critical thinking, the emergence of new intellectual paradigms such as post-colonial studies, gender studies, women's studies, socio-political upheavals, etc.


Comparative literature stems from literature, linguistics, philosophy, history, anthropology, and cultural studies. It is both a multidisciplinary and an interdisciplinary field aiming for a multidimensional and comprehensive understanding of two different phenomena. Initially, it involved the study of literary and cultural expressions across national, linguistic, ideological, and disciplinary boundaries. From its origins in exploring literature across nations and languages, comparative literature has evolved into an interdisciplinary approach within the humanities and social sciences. The method of comparison can be applied to various subjects, themes, periods, texts, phenomena, histories, cultures, movements, arts, politics, societies, etc.


Initially, comparative literature focused on analyzing and understanding two or more texts from different languages or countries. However, it can also examine two different texts by different authors in the same or different languages. Translation plays a significant role in comparing texts from distinct languages, remaining a major pillar of comparative literature. A comparatist is an individual engaged in comparative study/analysis. A proficient comparatist in languages requires proficiency in two or more languages, coupled with a deep understanding of two or more cultures. There can also be a comparison within a language of two different texts. Similarly, a comparatist in social sciences needs an understanding of two or more social phenomena or factors within society to compare multiple aspects. In this context, knowing two languages is not crucial; understanding two phenomena or factors for comparison is essential. According to the Department of Comparative Study at Ohio State University, "Comparative Literature focuses on studying literature from diverse cultures, nations, and genres, exploring relationships between literature and other forms of cultural expression. It raises questions about the role of literature in society, how literature evolves over time as a form of art, and its interactions with values, social movements, and political contexts?"


In the rapidly evolving local and global social landscapes of today, comparative literature assumes amplified significance due to increased mobility and the shrinking of time and space which subsequently led to bringing two or more cultures closer. Its importance escalates as various nations and individuals intermingle. Creating sustainable, peaceful, and respectful societies necessitates a deep understanding and appreciation of diverse cultures, languages,people, and traditions. This comprehension stands as a crucial factor in striving for harmonious coexistence within our interconnected world with diversities.


Beginning of Comparative Literature:-


Scholars of comparative literature believe that the term Comparative Literature was firstly introduced in the collection Course de literature compare published in 1816 in France. The use of comparative literature in Germany dates back to 1854. For the first time in 1818, Mathew Arnold put forward the concept of comparative literature in English.


This means that the concept of comparative literature came to the fore in the nineteenth century In which the method of studying more than one literature was developed. The second point is that this is not a literary movement. Departments of comparative literature were established in


universities, lectures were given, discussions and debates were organized. The conclusions that emerged from them, the nature of comparative literature became clear from those conclusions.


In 1903, Benedetto Croce rejected comparative studies as an independent discipline. He did not see any difference between pure literary history and comparative literature. In the 1920s, Layne Cooper called comparative literature a 'Bogus Term', which has neither sense nor syntax. Sahman Jeune considered the study of influence as the main element in comparative literature (Reference- Awadhesh Kumar Singh's 'The future of comparative literary studies compiled in New Direction in comparative Interature).


In this way cause and effect is studied in comparative literature. The early comparative literature, which began in France, analyzes this influence. So in this study the key term is influence. This effect is studied in the comparative literature. What we call the soul of a nation does not always remain unaffected. Sometimes, she gets influenced by someone or the other. The concept of culture and nationality comes from this comparative literature. The life of national identity and cultural tradition becomes important many times.



History and Evolution of Comparative Literature:-

In the realm of science and information and communication technology (ICT), with a growing awareness of 'differences' and the consciousness surrounding them, the study of literature, particularly comparative literature, becomes essential. Literature serves as a mirrorreflecting society, portraying contemporary life, habits, styles, cultures, religions, and politics. Engaging with literature aids in understanding society at large. Reading comparative literature not only involves comprehending the 'other,' as we perceive it, but also delves into discovering aspects we have yet to explore. It represents a process of broadening our understanding of the world, cultures, people, and literature, which we previously categorized as 'other, though, in reality, they are an integral part of us.


In multicultural, multilingual, and multi-religious societies such as India and South Africa, comparative literature holds particular significance due to the visibility of linguistic, cultural, and religious diversities within these contexts. Unlike European countries where crossing national borders is essential for comparison, comparative literature within India assumes a different relevance and significance. It provides distinct approaches to understanding the 'other,' fostering mutual understanding within a society.


In his article "Comparative Literature," published in the Encyclopedia of Translation and Interpretation (2022), Rodriguez Lius discusses the origins of comparative literature in the 19th century alongside emerging fields like comparative law and comparative philology. His focus lies within the European context. Lius emphasizes that comparative literature aims to identify commonalities among various legal systems, languages, and, specifically, different literary works.


The term's origin remains a topic of debate, with its initial developments traced back to France. The earliest record of the term appears in Jean-François-Michel Noël's volume. Cours de littérature comparée, published in 1816, though it significantly differed from the eventual concept of comparative literature. The pioneers in this field include Abel-François Villermain, Philarète Chasles, and Jean-Jacques Ampère. Charles-Augustin Saint-Beuve notably contributed to establishing comparative literature as a formal field during a conference in 1868, having previously discussed "compared literary history" in 1840.


The first specialized journal on this subject was published in Cluj, Romania, in 1877 by Hugo Meltzl, under various titles translating to 'comparative literature journal. It was later titled Acta Comparationis Litterarum Universarum in 1879. The term gained prominence in English through Hutcheson Macaulay Posnett's work published in 1886, specifically named Comparative Literature (Rodriguez 2022).


Comparative literature has become an accepted discipline workdwide. Its establishment initially occurred in France but eventually gained recognition in both American and European.





Various Schools of Comparative Literature:-



The study of comparative literature encompasses diverse approaches and perspectives.. It comprises three prominent schools: the French, German, and American schools, which laid the groundwork for our initial understanding of this field. In more recent times, the Indian school of comparative literature has contributed significantly, offering unique viewpoints and enriching the broader understanding within this discipline. Moreover, there exist numerous other schools and associations of comparative literature worldwide, varying across nations, regions, and languages.



The French School:

The establishment of comparative literature as a discipline and its global dissemination owe credit to French intellectuals. The study of comparative literature in French commenced during the second and third decades of the twentieth century, exerting a profound influence on the literary landscape until World War II. Pioneering this discipline were notable figures like Abel Francois Villemain (1790-1870), who delivered a series of lectures in Paris between 1824 and 1829. His works, Tableue de la literature au VIIIe siecle and Tableue de la literature en Moyen Age en France, en Italie, en Espagne et en Anglettere, were foundational. His such as Philarete Charles and Jean-Jacques Ampere extended Villemain's legacy. Philarete Charles (1798 1873) extensively connected French literature with other European literary traditions, producing over forty volumes of criticism. Claudio Gullen, in The Challenges of Comparative Literature, highlighted Charles's comparisons between authors, countries, and literature from Germany, France, Spain, England, among others. Charles characterized French genius as exceptionally congenial, embracing all emotions and thoughts from diverse civilizations, setting France apart yet allowing a profound understanding of others.


The German School:


The German school of comparative literature flourished along side the French school, spanning from the mid-nineteenth century to the period of World War II. Among the prominent figures within this school were scholars and critics such as Peter Szondi, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, and Friedrich Schlegel. Peter Szondi played a pivotal role in fostering comparative scholarship at the Free University, Berlin. He achieved this by inviting renowned contemporary critics, including Jacques Derrida, Lionel Trilling, Pierre Bourdieu, Theodor Adorno, and others, to contribute to the field.


The American School:


A study of the American school of comparative literature delineates the reasons for its emergence as a discipline, distinct from its European counterparts, which diverse racial, cultural, linguistic, ethnic, national, and religious backgroun 19/268 influx of immigrants since Columbus's voyages in 1492. Early concepts suc Pot" and Transcendentalism laid the groundwork for the burgeoning of Comparative Literature in America.


The Indian School:


The Indian school of comparative studies offers a distinctive perspective to the evolution of comparative literature, given India's diverse tapestry of region, culture, language, races, ethnicity, and tradition. This adds a multilingual, multicultural, and transnational dimension to the study of diversities within the discipline.This adds a multilingual, multicultural, and transnational dimension to the study of diversities within the discipline. Indian comparatists engage in the comparative analysis of various Indian languages and literatures, encompassing Hindi, Urdu, Bengali, Tamil, Malayalam, Gujarati, Assamese, Telugu, Kannada, Marathi, and more. Translation serves as a critical tool in comparing these linguistic traditions. Prominent figures in Indian comparative studies include Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Sukanta Chaudhuri, A. K. Ramanujan, Bijay Kumar Das, Sisir Kumar Das, Meenakshi Mukherjee. Harish Trivedi, and R. K. Singh.



National Identity and Comparative Literature:-



We know that the time when comparative literature started in Europe. At the same time nationalism was on the rise all over Europe. Politically, this nationalism pushed all European countries to war against each other. Scholars believe that comparative literature originated against the national literature. National resources are supporter of partisanship while 'comparative' has an underlying sense of transcendence from these national boundaries which includes an underlying desire to develop unity and harmony among nations. At the time when war and violence were spoken in the politics of Europe, people were claiming the superiority and difference of their respective nations. People could easily move within the borders of each other's nation


 Colonialism and Comparative Literature:-


European scholars of comparative literature expressed the opinion that comparison is possible only in literature of the same level. Therefore European literature cannot be compared with the literature of the colonies. Only European literature can have universal acceptance. The literature of the colonies would never reach that level. This racist, imperialistic declaration of Macaulay included the recognition of scholars of comparative literature. Fitzgerald, the European scholar who translated Omar Khayyam's Ruwais also had the same belief. At the core of which is the belief that the European mind is superior, European literature is superior, while the people of Asia and Africa are still 'primitive'. They have yet to learn civilization from Europe. At this time in comparative literature, the argument developed that comparative study can be of text. There cannot be a comparative study of oral literature or oral culture. The reason for this is that written text is better than oral literature. That is why oral epics cannot be considered as epics. In backward societies, most of the literature is oral That doesn't even figure in the count. Therefore the poetry of Homer, Greek literature, the plays of Shakespeare, and literature of Milton are important because they are included in the text


Even though Europeans came declaring that there are the best, but a new type of nationalism was also born in the colonies. And this nationalism gave a new perspective to comparative literature. In this process two new arguments came-


(1) As is the literature of the European people, Indian knowledge is also the same and in many respects it is superior to the European literature. For this argument, new text of the best classic literature like Ramayana, Mahabharata, Veda, Purana, Kalidasa's works etc. came to the fore. At the core of this study emerged the new nationalism of the colonies.


(2) It is assumed that Europe is superior and we try to make ourselves like them. European literature is the standard and sometimes we too can touch that standard. For example, Shakespeare is the greatest writer of all time. There is no dispute in this. But our Kalidas is also a painter for us. Europeans also believed that Kalidas was the Shakespeare of the East.


Important dimensions of comparative literature:-



(1) Comparative literature is such a critical study of literature which studies the literature of two or more linguistic, cultural and national groups. Generally, the study of works of two writers speaking one language does not come under the category of comparative literature. We cannot put the comparative criticism written on Hindi Poets Dev and Bihari in the category of comparative literature. There is only one exception to this. If a language is read and written in more than one country, then the study of literature composed in the same language in both those countries can come within comparative literature. There can be a comparative study of English literature of Canada and Australia.




(2) Every country in Europe has only one language, but India has many languages, therefore literature of different languages of the same country (India) can also be studied comparatively There can be a comparative study of Hindi and Bengali and there can also be a comparative study of Bengali literature and Hindi literature of India. Also, no study of folk literature can come under the category of comparative literature.


(3) This study is intersectional. Therefore, scholars of comparative literature study translation studies, sociology, Knowledge of other branches of knowledge like Cultural Studies, Sociology,


Cultural Studies, History etc. happens to be. This Achyavan is not a pure literary, classical, poetic study.


(4) A student of comparative literature transcends narrow national boundaries while studying literature Transcends all subjects like psychology, philosophy, archeology history etc


(5) There is an analysis of influence in comparative literature dealing the issues of influence of writer and culture on the other writer under reference.


(6) According to Henry H. H. Remak, 'comparative literature is the comparative study of the literature of one nation with the literature of other nations beyond its confines. That study is also the study of mutual relations between different fields of knowledge like art, history, social science, science, theology etc.


Views of Rene Wellek:


Rane Wellek has criticized several points of the concept of comparative literature, especially the attitude of influencing literature. He has drawn some conclusions by comparing the general literature to the comparative literature on autocracy. Linguistics is also an area of comparative study, especially the basis of historical linguistics



This is the first time that Van Tieghem, his forerunner and follower, think in the tone of positivism of nineteenth-century which focuses on study of causes and effects. They believe in cursory interpretation, which is used to judge the basic objects, characters, situations, things etc, according to the chronological order of the earlier work. They have collected parallels and sometimes juxtapositions, but they have never shown what these relationships show, except for the fact that one author knows and has read the other. Cursory interpretation goes nowhere and does not succeed in establishing a causal relationship in the literature. One has fallen short and is also necessary. I do not know of any literary history that has given evidence of such a relationship or could have done so. Such separation does not result in works of art that are complete, whose conception rests in free imagination, whose integrity and meaningfulness suffer if they are broken down into sources and effects. Rene Wellek points out that we should consider what is important for us.


Comparative Literature and Translation Studies:-


Translation has always had a relationship with comparative literature. It is not necessary for every person to know all the languages. Therefore, role of translation is necessary for comparison between two literatures. It has been recognized from the beginning that comparative Literature is the major discipline and translation was treated subsidiary discipline


There is no originality in translation and there should not be. Therefore, if the early translation of comparative literature is understood in this way, then it is not just an 'ally of comparative literature Its study has its own significance, which is greater than the study of comparative literature in many ways. But leter on perception about Translation Studies has changed even the expert of comparative literature changed their opinion and Translation Studies occupied the significant position


Conclusion:


The interrelationship of comparative literature and Translation Studies is very close. Although its relations have been changing time to time and their status as discipline has been changing.


Gayatri Chakravati Spivak in her book Death of a Discipline (2003) and Susan Basnet in 1995 declared the death of comparative literature as discipline of studies. Spivak talks about the end of the need and relevance of comparative studies after the end of the Cold War These answers emphasize questioning and redefining Southern cultures. The traditional framework of comparative literature has become completely unacceptable, so her opinion proposes, in the spirit of Derrida's call for Politics of Friendship, that comparative literature exemplifies how the humanities and social sciences can complement each other. Similarly, she also proposes that comparative literature should advocate satellite culture beyond global culture. She proposes to imagine ourselves as planetary subjects rather than global agents and the importance of comparative literature as a methodology remains relevant. Comparative literature is not literature in itself. Comparative literature cannot be imagined without literature. Literature available in two languages can be used for comparative study only through translation. In this unit the concept and role of comparative literature in the context of nationalities and identities have been discussed along with the meaning, origin and development and introduction of different schools of comparative Literature.



References:


Mangattu, Manu. (2013). Comparative Literature An Overview. 10.13140/RG.2.2.13003.34084.

Özyön, Arzu (PDF) introduction to comparative literature: A guide for literature students.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362044269_Introduction_to_Comparative_Literature_A_Guide_for_Literature_Students

Şahin, Elmas. (2015). On Comparative Literature. International Journal of Literature and Arts. 4. 5-12. 10.11648/j.ijla.s.2016040101.12.

Sangia, Rohib. (2014). Comparative Literature: An Overview. 10.17605/OSF.IO/RD73W.


(Imeges:1)

(Words:3,488)

paper 206: African Literature

Hello readers!! This blog task is about Assignment writing on A Limited Woman: Character is in Question in Buchi Emecheta Novel ...